Compoundの‌価格

$GRVT TL;DR: 8.42 million DAI allocated under Proposal 536 were allegedly converted into 344,780 COMP tokens through exchange transactions. 58 minutes before voting closed on Proposals 580 and 582, the assets were transferred back to the Safe multisig wallet to delegate voting power. $1.6 billion represents the total value locked (TVL) recorded by Compound Finance on DefiLlama metrics at the time of the complaint. The Compound Foundation was formally accused by delegate Ugurmersin of misappropriating 8.42 million DAI from the Compound DAO reserves to purchase COMP tokens and influence key governance decisions during September 2026. Alleged Misappropriation and Vote Manipulation The formal accusation was published on the decentralized protocol’s official governance forum. The complainant asserts that the funds allocated under Proposal 536 were intended to be safeguarded as operational capital for the community. According to a market report, the approved terms explicitly prohibited speculative use of these assets and mandated that they remain under the exclusive ownership of the decentralized autonomous organization. On-chain records presented by the delegate detail that the 8.42 million DAI were swapped on an exchange for 344,780 COMP tokens. According to Ugurmersin’s analysis, these assets were transferred back to the Safe wallet 58 minutes before voting closed on Proposals 580 and 582. The signers of the multisig treasury allegedly delegated that voting power immediately to the Foundation’s address. The information submitted by the delegate suggests that this technical maneuver enabled the approval of handing over treasury control to the Treasury Management Committee (TMC). It also facilitated the ratification of a Version 4 (V4) development program valued at $52 million. The complaint also mentions the alleged involvement of collaborating entities, including the Compound Growth Working Group, audit firm ChainSecurity, and security provider Certora. The source noted that it has not yet been able to independently verify the transaction records referenced in the allegation, while the Compound Foundation has not released an official statement on the matter. Governance Friction in the DeFi Ecosystem Conflicts surrounding treasury control reflect a persistent challenge within decentralized lending protocols. DefiLlama market data places Compound Finance at approximately $1.6 billion in total value locked and a market capitalization near $230 million, with the COMP token trading around $23 and a direct treasury of $8.26 million as of late September 2026. By comparison, Aave V3 holds more than $18 billion in locked assets. The situation shares direct parallels with the governance dispute seen in Aave in late 2025. During that episode, Aave Chain Initiative founder Marc Zeller claimed that wallets tied to Aave Labs intervened to tip the balance in favor of the “Aave Will Win” proposal, which initially passed with 52.58% support. While the Foundation has not addressed the misappropriation claims, representatives from the implicated groups have recently defended the legitimacy of their operational processes. In a forum post dated September 24, 2026, delegate AranaDigital argued that Snapshot votes serve as a fully legitimate tool for operational efficiency when resolving matters that do not require direct on-chain execution. The complainant confirmed that all on-chain traces and forum screenshots have been preserved publicly, pending formal responses to the delegate community from the technical teams at Certora, ChainSecurity, and the Compound Foundation.

$GRVT The Compound Foundation is facing a misappropriation accusation from a delegate who went public with the claim that the Foundation made a move to seize control of the $52 million spending program and treasury by quietly converting 8.42 million DAI from reserves into COMP tokens.  The red flags in the post were the secrecy around the moves and a misrepresentation of the holdings as “liquid” DAI, even though the funds had already been swapped into COMP.  The accusation against Compound  The Compound governance dispute traces back to what Ugurmersin claims is the misuse of around 8.42 million DAI of DAO reserves handed to the Foundation under the strict stipulations in Proposal 536:  The money was to back protocol operations only It was meant to stay entirely DAO-owned It was restricted from any speculative trading And it should not be used to bankroll the Foundation’s own costs Ugurmersin is citing blockchain records as evidence that the funds were used for unauthorized purposes.  The 8.42 million DAI were allegedly swapped for 344,780 COMP on an exchange, returned and then delegated to the Foundation’s own voting address by the signers of the treasury multisig.  According to Ugurmersin, the COMP tokens were returned to the Safe 58 minutes before voting closed on Proposals 580 and 582. Ugurmersin alleges that the Foundation used those tokens to sway the governance process, shifting nearly all DAO funds under the Treasury Management Committee (TMC), a body it helps sign for, and pushed through a $52 million V4 program that benefits the Foundation itself.  The Compound Growth Working Group, security firm Certora and auditor ChainSecurity were all named as supporters of the moves. Cryptopolitan could not independently verify the transaction claims, and the Foundation has not responded to the accusation.  The delegate invited the Foundation, the working group’s delegates PGov and AranaDigital, ChainSecurity and Certora to reply. Leading lending protocols face governance drama The Compound accusation stoked comparisons with the Aave governance fight that started in December 2025 after delegates flagged how a proposed CoWSwap integration would redirect swap fees from the Aave DAO treasury.  The “Aave Will Win” proposal that was meant to end the dispute did not close cleanly either.  Aave Chain Initiative founder Marc Zeller alleged that addresses linked to Aave Labs had swayed the outcome after the proposal cleared its first governance hurdle with 52.58% approval, as Cryptopolitan reported at the time.  Where Compound stands as the dispute opens Compound is a smaller target than Aave. DefiLlama lists Compound Finance with about $1.6 billion in total value locked and a $230 million market capitalization, with COMP trading near $23 and an on-chain treasury of roughly $8.26 million. Aave V3, by comparison, holds close to $18 billion. The parties named in the post have not addressed the misappropriation claim directly, but the working group has recently defended how Compound runs its votes. In a September 24 forum reply on a separate security-provider renewal, AranaDigital argued that Snapshot votes are a legitimate way for delegates to decide matters that need no on-chain transaction, calling the practice an operational efficiency rather than a lesser class of vote.  The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

$COMP Compound: Bottom complete vs the 2026 Cryptocurrency bull-market Can COMPUSDT grow 9,000%? Very doubtful, this is beyond a new all-time high, it is beyond the chart structure and cycle projections, I don't think it possible. For COMPUSDT to produce 9,770% total growth from current prices, around $24, it would need to rise all the way to $2,369. Now, don't get me wrong, it is always possible and many Cryptocurrencies have been known to grow this much during a strong bullish period, it is just not do-able here based on the chart. A most reasonable target is $566 which is close to the high from August 2021. This is a great long-term target to aim for with more than 2,222% profits potential. A new ATH in 2028 or 2029 can happen above $911 or $1,000 or $1,200 or the 1.618 Fib. extension level at $1,468. Prepare a strategy and be ready to wait. Secure profits on the way up. COMPUSDT can grow 500%, 1,000%, 1,500%, 2,000% or more in the next two years. Knowing this, a new position can be entered here focused on the long-term. We sell portions on each target on the way up; each time resistance is met, we secure some profits and our trade. Make a habit of withdrawing; make it a habit of selling once a resistance level is hit. Make a habit to buy each and every time prices move down, each and every time the action moves to support. In this way we can learn to move with the market flow. Normally, we tend to interpret the market impulse in reverse. As soon as a project is ready to rise, we get the impulse to sell, coupled with some anxiety, panic, hurry and doubt, the body tends to move on its own if we are not calm enough to be able to see the impulse as a thought. When the energy cannot be processed mentally, the body starts to move and that's when we take actions and decisions that we later regret. Is like receiving an impulse telling us, "Hurry, buy!"$YGG

$COMP Compound: Bottom complete vs the 2026 Cryptocurrency bull-market Can COMPUSDT grow 9,000%? Very doubtful, this is beyond a new all-time high, it is beyond the chart structure and cycle projections, I don't think it possible. For COMPUSDT to produce 9,770% total growth from current prices, around $24, it would need to rise all the way to $2,369. Now, don't get me wrong, it is always possible and many Cryptocurrencies have been known to grow this much during a strong bullish period, it is just not do-able here based on the chart. A most reasonable target is $566 which is close to the high from August 2021. This is a great long-term target to aim for with more than 2,222% profits potential. A new ATH in 2028 or 2029 can happen above $911 or $1,000 or $1,200 or the 1.618 Fib. extension level at $1,468. Prepare a strategy and be ready to wait. Secure profits on the way up. COMPUSDT can grow 500%, 1,000%, 1,500%, 2,000% or more in the next two years. Knowing this, a new position can be entered here focused on the long-term. We sell portions on each target on the way up; each time resistance is met, we secure some profits and our trade. Make a habit of withdrawing; make it a habit of selling once a resistance level is hit. Make a habit to buy each and every time prices move down, each and every time the action moves to support. In this way we can learn to move with the market flow. Normally, we tend to interpret the market impulse in reverse. As soon as a project is ready to rise, we get the impulse to sell, coupled with some anxiety, panic, hurry and doubt, the body tends to move on its own if we are not calm enough to be able to see the impulse as a thought. When the energy cannot be processed mentally, the body starts to move and that's when we take actions and decisions that we later regret. Is like receiving an impulse telling us, "Hurry, buy!"